Templates

Coming soon

Follow for latest

Getting started

Introduction Install Abstract Global Wallet Install Next.js 14 Install Dynamic Install Shadcn Ui Deploy EVM Contract

All Components

Abstract Gasless NFT Mint Component Abstract Sign In Chain Selector Crypto Product Card Nft Mint Card NFT Portfolio Dashboard LiFi Widget Polymarket Widget Component

LI.FI Widget Checkout Routing Guide

Plan a LI.FI widget checkout flow with the right route scope, layout, wallet timing, and configuration order before deeper implementation work begins.

A LI.FI widget can do more than render a swap or bridge surface. In a checkout flow, it becomes part of the product decision path: where users land, how much route choice they see, when wallet connection appears, and what happens after the transfer completes.

If you want the broader evaluation path first, continue with the LI.FI Playground Guide. If you are ready for deeper setup details after checkout decisions are clear, move next to the LI.FI Widget integration guide or the LI.FI Widget Embed Guide.

Who this guide helps

frontend engineers evaluating widget-based checkout, funding, or onboarding flows
product and engineering teams deciding how much route freedom a LI.FI widget should expose
builders comparing wallet timing, route scope, and post-transfer handoff before implementation hardens those choices

When a LI.FI widget checkout flow makes sense

A checkout-style LI.FI widget flow is usually the right fit when asset movement is part of a larger job, not a separate destination.

onboarding that requires funding on a specific chain before users can continue
deposit or treasury flows where the product expects a narrower route than a public swap page
dashboards that need an embedded bridge or swap step inside an existing app shell
wallet-aware flows where the transfer should feel like one stage of checkout instead of a separate research task

In these cases, the core UX question is not only how to mount the widget. It is how much freedom the route should expose before users lose sight of what the product is asking them to do.

Checkout routing is narrower than a generic playground exercise. The goal is to shape a route that feels intentional, understandable, and easier to support.

What checkout routing changes compared with a broad LI.FI playground

A broad LI.FI playground is useful for exploration. Checkout routing is about control.

whether the widget is a full destination, an embedded panel, or one step in onboarding
whether chains and tokens should stay broad or reflect a narrower product path
whether wallet connection should happen before the widget opens or inside the route itself
whether the page explains what the transfer unlocks after completion
whether the widget configuration matches support expectations for version one

The checkout questions to answer early

Is the widget the destination or a step?

A dedicated route usually benefits from more context and more room. An onboarding or dashboard step usually benefits from fewer choices and tighter scope.

How broad should the route be?

Some products benefit from wide route exploration. Others need a narrower checkout path that keeps users aligned with one destination chain, one expected asset path, or one operational next step.

When should wallet connection happen?

App-level connection can feel smoother in a wallet-aware product shell, while widget-first connection can work well on a dedicated checkout surface where the task is obvious.

What happens after completion?

A checkout flow needs a visible next step so users understand whether the transfer unlocks onboarding, funds an account, prepares a balance, or moves them into another product action.

Core LI.FI widget controls that matter for checkout routing

The existing Gizmolab LI.FI docs already point to the controls that matter most when a route moves from exploration into checkout design.

allowedChains

Use allowedChains when the checkout should support only the chains that match the surrounding product flow.

allowedTokens

Use allowedTokens when token choice should reflect the asset path that matters after checkout rather than broad exploration.

transactionSettings

Use transactionSettings when the route should feel more guided than exploratory and transfer behavior needs to match the rest of the checkout UX.

variant, subvariant, and appearance

Use layout controls to decide whether the widget belongs in a wide destination page, a compact embedded panel, or another guided route shape.

theme

Use theme after the base route is stable so visual polish does not hide route-scope issues or wallet-state confusion.

walletManagement

Review wallet management after the route model is clear, especially when the flow starts disconnected or includes guided onboarding.

fee and feeConfig

Review monetization logic after route clarity, disclosure expectations, and support responsibilities are understood.

WidgetConfig

Use a shared WidgetConfig object when several pages or checkout surfaces should inherit the same LI.FI widget baseline.

A practical implementation sequence

1. Install the widget package

npm install @lifi/widget

2. Start with a minimal render

Render the smallest possible widget in the same page container where the checkout flow is expected to live. That first pass answers the only question that matters at this stage: does the widget render cleanly in the intended route and container?

"use client";

import LiFiWidget from "@/components/open-source-components/lifi-widget/LiFiWidget";

export default function CheckoutRoute() {
  return <LiFiWidget integrator="YourAppName" />;
}

Test one variable at a time. When layout, route restrictions, wallet behavior, theme, and fee logic all change together, routing decisions become harder to diagnose.

3. Add route constraints in order

minimal render with integrator
layout choices with variant, subvariant, and appearance
chain restrictions with allowedChains
token restrictions with allowedTokens
transaction behavior with transactionSettings
theme alignment with theme
wallet behavior with walletManagement
fee logic with fee or feeConfig

4. Move into shared config when the route is stable

Once the checkout behavior feels right, centralize the widget defaults in a shared config.

"use client";

import LiFiWidget from "@/components/open-source-components/lifi-widget/LiFiWidget";
import type { WidgetConfig } from "@lifi/widget";

const widgetConfig: WidgetConfig = {
  variant: "wide",
  appearance: "dark",
  allowedChains: [1, 137, 8453],
  transactionSettings: {
    allowSwitchChain: true,
  },
};

export default function RoutedCheckoutWidget() {
  return <LiFiWidget integrator="YourAppName" config={widgetConfig} />;
}

Implementation workflow checkpoints

1. Start with a minimal render

Install the package and render the smallest possible widget in the same page container where the checkout flow is expected to live.

2. Test the route in the real page shell

Evaluate page width, surrounding nav, drawer or modal constraints, spacing, scroll behavior, and any existing wallet provider context before tightening configuration.

3. Compare broad and narrow versions

Run at least one pass with broader routing freedom, then compare it with a scoped version so you can see whether restrictions improve clarity or just hide unresolved UX questions.

4. Add route constraints one layer at a time

Keep routing decisions separate from visual decisions and business logic by layering layout, chain restrictions, token restrictions, transaction behavior, theme, wallet behavior, and fee logic in order.

5. Move into shared config when the route is stable

Once the checkout behavior feels right, centralize widget defaults in a shared config so multiple checkout surfaces inherit the same baseline.

Checkout layout patterns that usually work well

Dedicated checkout route

Why it works

users understand the purpose quickly
the widget has room for routing context
supporting copy can explain what the transfer unlocks next

Watch for

adding too many choices before the route model is proven
treating the page like a generic component demo
adding fees or extra business logic before route clarity exists

Embedded dashboard or treasury step

Why it works

users stay inside the interface they already trust
route scope can reflect product policy more closely
the widget supports a concrete task rather than a separate exploration session

Watch for

layouts that feel too cramped for a high-stakes transfer
unclear visual hierarchy between the widget and surrounding controls
hidden assumptions about the wallet state inherited from the app shell

Guided onboarding checkout

Why it works

the route can stay narrow and intentional
the next step is easier to explain
support expectations stay closer to the actual product promise

Watch for

broad token or chain choices that conflict with the onboarding path
vague completion states after the transfer finishes
wallet prompts that appear later than the user expects

Wallet timing is part of routing, not a separate concern

Teams often treat wallet connection as a later implementation detail. In checkout routing, it changes the flow from the first interaction.

App-level wallet connection

Best when the product already has wallet-aware navigation and the widget is one surface inside a broader session.

Widget-first connection

Best when the route is dedicated and the asset-movement intent is obvious.

Guided onboarding connection

Best when the transfer is one step inside a structured path and the route should stay narrow.

For wallet-specific planning, continue with the LI.FI Widget Wallet Connect Guide and the LI.FI Widget Supported Wallets and Routing Guide.

Common mistakes in LI.FI checkout routing

Testing too many variables at once

When layout, chain restrictions, tokens, wallet behavior, theme, and fee logic all change together, it becomes much harder to understand what caused the result you are seeing.

Treating a checkout route like a generic playground

A playground is useful for learning, but a checkout flow needs a narrower product promise. If the route behaves like open exploration while the product expects a guided funding path, users will feel the mismatch quickly.

Keeping the route broader than support expectations

If the product can only explain or support a smaller set of chains, tokens, or next steps, the route should usually mirror that reality.

Hiding the post-transfer step

Users should not finish a route and then wonder whether they funded an account, completed onboarding, or unlocked the next action.

Solving visual polish before route clarity

A beautifully themed widget can still create a confusing checkout experience if the route scope and wallet timing are unresolved.

A production-minded checkout checklist

the widget works in the real page container
the route is intentionally broad or intentionally narrow
chain restrictions reflect actual product support
token restrictions reflect the next step in the user journey
wallet connection timing matches the surrounding app flow
supporting copy explains what users are doing and why
the completion state leads to a clear next action
fee logic, if used, is reviewed separately from the base route
adjacent docs send builders to the right next implementation step

Where to continue in the LI.FI docs flow

LI.FI Widget component reference for the live component surface and core props
LI.FI Widget integration guide for the broader React and Next.js setup path
LI.FI Playground Guide for wider evaluation and incremental testing
LI.FI Widget Playground Routing Guide for route-shaping comparisons in a playground context
LI.FI Widget Embed Guide for practical embedding in React or Next.js
LI.FI Widget Error Handling Guide for route, wallet, and execution recovery states
LI.FI Widget Embedded Wallet Routing Guide for embedded-wallet-specific route decisions
LI.FI Widget Embedded Wallet Onboarding for guided onboarding flows
Docs introduction if you need the broader docs orientation

FAQ

What is a LI.FI widget checkout routing guide?

A LI.FI widget checkout routing guide helps builders decide how the widget should behave inside a checkout, onboarding, funding, or embedded transfer flow. It focuses on route scope, layout fit, wallet timing, and practical configuration order.

Is this different from a LI.FI playground guide?

Yes. A LI.FI playground is broader and better for exploration. A checkout routing guide is narrower and focuses on shaping a product-ready route instead of only testing whether the widget renders.

When should the route stay broad?

Keep the route broad when the widget is the main destination and users genuinely benefit from wider exploration across chains or assets.

When should the route be narrower?

Narrow the route when the widget supports onboarding, deposits, treasury actions, or another flow where too many choices would create friction or increase support burden.

Should wallet connection happen before the widget loads?

It depends on the product shell. App-level connection often works best when the rest of the app is already wallet-aware. Widget-first connection often works best on a dedicated checkout route where asset movement is the main task.

Should route constraints be configured before layout testing?

Usually not. Start with a simple render in the real container, then add route constraints after the base interaction is stable.

Does this replace the LI.FI widget docs?

No. This guide is the decision layer for checkout routing. Use it with the LI.FI widget docs, embed guide, wallet connect guide, and playground guides as implementation work gets more specific.

Continue from checkout routing to implementation

A LI.FI widget checkout flow works best when the route feels intentional from the first interaction: the layout matches the job of the page, the route scope matches the product promise, and wallet timing does not surprise the user.

Continue with the LI.FI Widget integration guide
Review the LI.FI Widget Embed Guide
Use the LI.FI Widget Error Handling Guide before launch if the route needs clearer recovery states

See something you like?

Take your project further with our advanced custom development.

Let's chat

"One of the only full-stack Web3 component libraries i've seen in the space so far. Ten out of ten recommended. Saved me a ton of time. Can't wait to see what templates they release next."

Samy

Side projects builder